Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 08:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$275
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 678
71% 568 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$120
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 38.9
30% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 28.3
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 336 279 297 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 414
Mixed 351
SusWrite 307
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.4
209% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 326
255% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 207 207 206 208 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 171
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 202
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$10
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 10.5
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 6.6
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2280 2280W
Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $445
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $302Nvidia RTX 3060 $325Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $850Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback