Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 19:00
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 216
2-Core 427
128% 245 Pts
4-Core 853
8-Core 1,693
150% 1,273 Pts
64-Core 2,814
174% 2,814 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 179
Parallax 184
152% 183 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
124% 157 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,688
Write 2,052
Mixed 1,767
412% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 107
387% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,598
DQ Write 1,560
DQ Mixed 1,218
1,014% 1,459 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
486GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 492 492 491 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 465
SusWrite 491
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 64.9
223% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
GOODRAM 240GB
2GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 330
Mixed 316
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 39.4
159% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 165
162% 257 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
182GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 492 492 492 405 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 488
Mixed 462
SusWrite 443
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 64.6
224% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 133%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 127 129 127 128 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 126
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
49GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 104 98 99 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 98.7
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 49.1
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 53
SC Mixed 37.3
113% 39.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 138%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback