Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 538
60% 473 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64% Good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 77
Parallax 67.7
71% 77.2 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 61.2
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 564 565 600 597 590 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 613
Write 565
Mixed 574
SusWrite 570
131% 580 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 36.7
121% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 491
360% 464 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 117%
Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
20GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 380 374 395 394 390 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
394GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 257 257 264 264 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 260
Write 259
Mixed 240
SusWrite 258
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 23.7
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 51.3
77% 142 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
365GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 168
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 140
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
283GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 38
Write 43
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 79.3
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
14GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 63.7
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
398GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 56 58 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 70
Mixed 48
SusWrite 57.5
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
14GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 102
Write 32.5
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 24.7
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
234GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 83 83 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 86
Write 87.5
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 80
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback