Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory47.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 18:57
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 483
58% 445 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 88.9
Parallax 77.9
78% 87.4 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 72.6
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 615 623 587 600 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 603
Write 554
Mixed 531
SusWrite 598
129% 572 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 484
351% 449 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 114%
Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
21GB free
Firmware: 03200001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 368
Mixed 309
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 15.5
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 124
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
437GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 264 269 264 265 266 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 244
Write 257
Mixed 234
SusWrite 264
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 22.6
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 49.8
78% 143 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
360GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 139 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 115
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 139
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
281GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 36
Write 42.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 79.5
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
48GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 69 68 70 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 73.5
Mixed 47
SusWrite 68.5
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
369GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 73
Mixed 48
SusWrite 58
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
50GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 47 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
26% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 48
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 46.5
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
228GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 66 56 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 85.2
Write 91.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 73.7
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback