Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory48.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 17:02
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 515
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.8% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 79
69% 83.3 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 62.5
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 573 563 617 569 576 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 528
Write 568
Mixed 526
SusWrite 569
124% 548 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 31.9
111% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 473
348% 448 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 110%
Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
66GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.65% Terrible
Read 54
Write 21
Mixed 37
SusWrite 31.8
8% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3.6
7% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
437GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 257 254 261 258 259 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 254
Write 257
Mixed 233
SusWrite 255
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 21.6
87% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 51.7
82% 151 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
365GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 111 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 173
Write 80.7
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 109
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 35
Write 42.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 79.3
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
53GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 80
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 48.7
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 14 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 53.5
Write 11
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 15.3
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 49
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 46.6
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
233GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 75 60 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 87.5
Write 90
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 73.2
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback