Supermicro X8ST3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X8ST3  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8ST3
Memory24.8 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131107
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 162
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 463
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2202 MHz, MLim: 1862 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 42.6
2% 16.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 201
Splatting 0.1
56% 76.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 34 6.3 21 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18% Very poor
Read 192
Write 120
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 28.1
20% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.6
29% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 0.2
4% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 18%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
148GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 44 42 46 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 82.2
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 43.8
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 44 42 46 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 58.8
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 43.7
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 61 54 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 48.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 61.6
38% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 62 59 57 55 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 72.6
Write 64.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 56.9
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G89DAF 1TB
454GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 26.1
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: JP4ONA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 75 73 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 68.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 75.6
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G MXIC 25L3205 68GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8ST3 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X8ST3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback