Supermicro X8ST3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Supermicro X8ST3 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8ST3
Memory	27 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 77.9 2-Core 164 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 460 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 38.6 30% 38.9 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.6 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 141 Mixed 79.9 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 10% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 446GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 36 36 34 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 90 Write 88.9 Mixed 53 SusWrite 36.1 50% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 114GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 36 36 34 37 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 71.7 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 36.1 42% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 374GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 69 62 66 69 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 57.9 Write 70.4 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 64.5 44% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 39%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 126GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 55 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 43.9 Write 37.7 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 53.9 32% 43.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 37%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G89DAF 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 341GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 44 33 52 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 21.7 Write 19.9 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 42.6 19% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 161GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 95 92 92 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 73 Write 65.6 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 92.1 49% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 75%
WDC WD10 EALX-009BA0 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 480GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 14 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.82% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 13 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 14.5 20% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G MXIC 25L3205 68GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X8ST3 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X8ST3

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	7x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	3x
Core i7 930Intel $149Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GBSSDBench 48%, 4 samples	4x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	1x

RAM
ATMEL 26DF321 48GBUnknownBench 44%, 76 samples	3x
MXIC 25L3205 44GBUnknownBench 33%, 74 samples	3x
ATMEL 26DF321 44GBUnknownBench 31%, 37 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16