bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory0.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 15:24
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 81
2-Core 123
54% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 187
22% 173 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3543) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 1.8
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.3
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 20 7.8 9.9 13 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 102
Write 85.2
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 19.5
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5474-001.A00LF 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $366WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback