Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79 11,598 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 166 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 310 39% 297 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 198E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 5.9 3% 3.97 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0F00) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 0.9 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 310 301 302 302 303 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 406GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 35 35 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 54.4 Write 33.2 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 34.7 47% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9905403-577.A00G 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	151x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	27x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 5,816 samples	21x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	15x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $119