Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory38.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 02:23
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 210
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 446
55% 418 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.1% Good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 75.8
70% 84.4 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 63.7
56% 69 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 529 546 552 563 550 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 605
Write 504
Mixed 582
SusWrite 531
125% 556 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 34.8
119% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 411
318% 426 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 113%
Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
22GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 361 364 56 66 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65% Good
Read 438
Write 366
Mixed 320
SusWrite 202
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 27
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 126
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65%
Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
436GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 251 254 260 262 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 250
Write 254
Mixed 242
SusWrite 252
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 21.9
83% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 48.9
77% 143 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
365GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 139
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 79 79 78 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 32
Write 44.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 74.8
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
52GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 71 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 69
Write 69.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 69.7
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34% Below average
Read 60
Write 75.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 57.9
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 51.2
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 46.5
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
233GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 79 82 79 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 89.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 80.1
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 74%
WDC WD10 EALX-009BA0 1TB
361GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 37.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 38.3
52% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback