Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 03:42
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 504
60% 464 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.6% Above average
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 71
Parallax 64.4
63% 71 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 56.7
47% 56.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 546 556 589 571 588 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 585
Write 593
Mixed 563
SusWrite 560
130% 575 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 36.7
117% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 487
354% 452 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 113%
Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
199GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 373 335 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 426
Write 364
Mixed 325
SusWrite 210
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 27.5
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 126
102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
437GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 255 259 263 259 264 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 255
Write 261
Mixed 242
SusWrite 258
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 22.6
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 49.2
78% 146 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
349GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 136 135 135 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 92.9
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 135
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 68 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 49
Write 63
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 66.1
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
46GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 66 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 76.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 64.1
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 52
Write 55.3
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 38.5
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
57GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 38
Write 44.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 40.6
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
230GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 78 78 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 79.5
Write 87.8
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 78.9
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback