Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 01:35
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 507
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 67.5
67% 76.1 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 61
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 576
Write 520
Mixed 563
124% 553 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 36.6
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 488
352% 446 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
22GB free
Firmware: 03200001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 360
Mixed 315
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 28
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 126
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
437GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 259
Write 262
Mixed 241
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 24.3
90% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 50.6
78% 143 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
365GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 154
Mixed 82.2
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.2
Write 42.5
Mixed 31
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
53GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 61.5
53% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.5
Write 75.2
Mixed 52.2
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 41
Write 48.8
Mixed 32
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
233GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54
Write 64.7
Mixed 43.7
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback