Performance Results

Gaming 26%
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 24%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
102% 190 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 838
92% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 30.3
18% 24.9 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 21.8
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 416 428 444 452 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 370
Mixed 411
SusWrite 432
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 30.6
147% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 37.2
87% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
648GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 113
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 31.2
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 30.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback