Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 19:29
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,193
106% 897 Pts
64-Core 2,204
136% 2,204 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 156
Parallax 175
128% 163 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
491GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2289 2320 1419 519 391 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 2,403
Mixed 1,970
SusWrite 1,198
417% 1,847 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 89.2
308% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,127
858% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 294%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
354GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2215 2226 729 223 186 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,821
Write 2,243
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 975
395% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 91.6
310% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1198
909% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 284%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
491GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,751
Write 8,649
Mixed 8,460
1,927% 8,620 MB/s
4K Read 673
4K Write 477
4K Mixed 139
1,450% 430 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1241
937% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
161GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 188 177 213 213 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 470
Write 270
Mixed 298
SusWrite 202
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 41.3
152% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 204
158% 218 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 133 136 130 136 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 418
Write 151
Mixed 206
SusWrite 131
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 36.8
142% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 120
103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 47.4
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 42.5
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback