Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,198
108% 909 Pts
64-Core 1,744
108% 1,744 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 156
Parallax 156
132% 158 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2200 2210 2214 2251 2244 2244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 2,330
Mixed 1,945
SusWrite 2,227
470% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 92.3
322% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,158
871% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 359%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
516GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2163 2179 2181 2185 2184 2215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 1,756
Write 1,190
Mixed 1900
SusWrite 2,184
397% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 91.7
309% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,450
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,234
923% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 355%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
489GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 462 464 463 463 462 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 206 209 146 192 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 386
Write 275
Mixed 286
SusWrite 198
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 41.1
151% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 200
155% 214 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 137 137 137 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 439
Write 138
Mixed 194
SusWrite 137
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 32.8
134% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 108
98% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 48.7
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 42.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 133%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback