Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 306
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,186
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 156
Parallax 158
133% 159 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2298 2330 2330 825 331 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 2,343
Mixed 1,944
SusWrite 1,402
423% 1,870 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 92.8
315% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1,150
865% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 307%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
353GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2229 784 441 179 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,835
Write 2,233
Mixed 1903
SusWrite 1,006
393% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 92.2
312% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1079
DQ Mixed 1,198
907% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 287%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
491GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,685
Write 8,467
Mixed 8,285
1,895% 8,479 MB/s
4K Read 653
4K Write 462
4K Mixed 491
1,864% 536 MB/s
DQ Read 1,743
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,228
970% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
161GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 177 192 202 203 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 378
Write 296
Mixed 289
SusWrite 193
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 41.6
152% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 217
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 131 134 132 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 424
Write 150
Mixed 210
SusWrite 126
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 37.5
143% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 114
101% 151 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 47.1
142% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 43
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback