Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 10:50
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 309
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,192
106% 898 Pts
64-Core 2198
136% 2198 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 156
Parallax 175
133% 165 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2343 2339 2326 2306 744 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,968
SusWrite 1,749
442% 1,954 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 93.8
319% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 1,131
856% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 329%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
371GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2243 2252 2251 2229 368 351 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 1802
Write 2315
Mixed 1,952
SusWrite 1,616
434% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 92.4
313% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,176
889% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 322%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
492GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,712
Write 8,421
Mixed 8,280
1,893% 8,471 MB/s
4K Read 658
4K Write 460
4K Mixed 495
1,875% 538 MB/s
DQ Read 1,752
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,201
958% 1,356 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 207 141 182 215 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 354
Write 288
Mixed 305
SusWrite 188
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 37.9
147% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 211
161% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 132 136 136 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 419
Write 152
Mixed 202
SusWrite 131
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 37.7
144% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 120
103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 46.6
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 42.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 130%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback