Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,185
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,204
136% 2,204 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 156
Parallax 159
133% 159 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2313 2325 2323 2305 1285 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 1,813
Write 2,326
Mixed 1,958
SusWrite 1,795
446% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 93.8
320% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 1,142
866% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 334%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
371GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2235 2238 2243 2236 2240 2238 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 1,812
Write 1,277
Mixed 1,940
SusWrite 2,238
410% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 92.5
313% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,397
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,212
916% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 362%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
492GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,877
Write 8,607
Mixed 8,454
1,932% 8,646 MB/s
4K Read 669
4K Write 458
4K Mixed 490
1,885% 539 MB/s
DQ Read 1,815
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,229
982% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 206 139 171 213 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 393
Write 293
Mixed 290
SusWrite 196
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 41.7
153% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 213
162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 135 135 128 132 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 430
Write 149
Mixed 197
SusWrite 136
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 38
142% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 114
100% 151 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 46.7
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 42.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 131%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback