Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 300
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,174
105% 889 Pts
64-Core 2,206
136% 2,206 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 155
Parallax 159
133% 159 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
119% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2303 2309 2317 1307 619 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 2,387
Mixed 1,966
SusWrite 1,510
432% 1,910 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 93.6
319% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 1,121
850% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 314%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
353GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2216 2226 2221 2237 2246 2245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 1,797
Write 2.5
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 2,232
283% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 92.9
314% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,197
904% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 360%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
491GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,640
Write 8,422
Mixed 8,356
1,894% 8,473 MB/s
4K Read 684
4K Write 478
4K Mixed 133
1,460% 432 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,246
939% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
161GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 210 206 207 212 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 458
Write 291
Mixed 319
SusWrite 216
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 41.9
154% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 214
162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 134 135 134 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 422
Write 150
Mixed 204
SusWrite 133
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 37.5
143% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 121
104% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$115
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 47
141% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 41.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 131%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback