Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 318
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,194
107% 904 Pts
64-Core 1,748
108% 1,748 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 153
Parallax 156
130% 156 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 133
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2190 2254 2272 2352 2362 2154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 1,811
Write 2,375
Mixed 1,983
SusWrite 2,264
478% 2108 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 96.8
332% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 1,089
824% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 364%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
523GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2232 2246 2249 2250 2248 2248 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 1,610
Mixed 1,947
SusWrite 2,246
430% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 92
313% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 1,178
851% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 355%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
504GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 462 464 463 464 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
169GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 135 183 136 216 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 385
Write 291
Mixed 284
SusWrite 186
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 41.5
149% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 213
162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
60GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 134 133 134 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 429
Write 148
Mixed 201
SusWrite 134
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 37.5
141% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 120
103% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$115
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 46.7
MC Mixed 46.7
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 39.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback