Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory121.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 01:43
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 222
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 866
78% 655 Pts
64-Core 1190
74% 1190 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
677GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 420 418 420 420 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 465
Mixed 442
SusWrite 406
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 45.9
148% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 351
262% 349 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 107%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
511GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 422 420 421 421 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 466
Mixed 407
SusWrite 408
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 48.7
157% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 355
255% 326 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 983 1282 1279 1285 1283 1005 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,289
Write 1319
Mixed 1,305
SusWrite 1,186
288% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 63.3
206% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 495
354% 460 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 208%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 277 279 277 278 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 390
Write 352
Mixed 361
SusWrite 277
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 26.4
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 59.3
45% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 167 163 160 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 220
Mixed 165
SusWrite 161
257% 192 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 2.3
428% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 1.8
401% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 93.1
Write 43.4
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 65.5
87% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback