Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory115.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 21:40
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 662
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 106
Reflection 67
Parallax 74
86% 82.2 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 51
53% 66.8 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
664GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 398 395 376 380 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 471
Write 424
Mixed 397
SusWrite 380
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 25.8
87% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 290
222% 304 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
510GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 400 396 377 382 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 403
Write 362
Mixed 334
SusWrite 382
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 30.7
103% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 208
184% 279 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 1142 1123 1031 1044 1057 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 1,126
Mixed 1,135
SusWrite 1,062
252% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 39.4
143% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 355
279% 397 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 173%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 99 102 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 350
Write 120
Mixed 318
SusWrite 101
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 15.9
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 60.7
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 62
45% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 122 119 122 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 216
Write 215
Mixed 154
SusWrite 120
232% 176 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 2
400% 5.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.9
401% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 81 84 81 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 110
Write 35.9
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 80.6
92% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 579 22 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback