Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory122.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 23:22
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 816
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 285
Parallax 187
216% 246 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 186
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 167%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 418 420 421 422 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 465
Mixed 435
SusWrite 416
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 45.8
148% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 339
258% 348 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
511GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 420 420 422 423 423 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 458
Mixed 417
SusWrite 418
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 49.5
155% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 341
259% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Asmt 2105 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 115 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 388
Write 355
Mixed 361
SusWrite 113
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 25.9
83% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 54
39% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 121 124 123 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 223
Mixed 166
SusWrite 122
242% 184 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 2.2
427% 6 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
377% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 74 69 73 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 115
Write 37.6
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 71.8
92% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback