Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 00:36
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 221
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 857
76% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 418 419 418 420 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 466
Mixed 442
SusWrite 411
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 45.9
149% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
511GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 421 419 420 422 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 460
Mixed 416
SusWrite 413
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 49.2
160% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 357
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 1264 1261 1268 1271 921 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1274
Write 1,309
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 1181
285% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 64
209% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 493
385% 545 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 214%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 366 364 363 365 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66% Good
Read 385
Write 365
Mixed 356
SusWrite 363
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 26
82% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 60.8
46% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 166 162 160 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 220
Mixed 167
SusWrite 161
257% 193 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 2.3
414% 5.93 MB/s
DQ Read 2.6
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
370% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 97%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 35.7
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 85.8
84% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback