Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory118.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 19:08
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 842
76% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
663GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 417 416 421 420 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 460
Mixed 440
SusWrite 409
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 45.6
148% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 107%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
510GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 419 419 421 421 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 466
Mixed 409
SusWrite 411
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 48.9
158% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1057 1269 1271 1278 1274 989 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,311
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 1,190
286% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 61.6
200% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 487
379% 534 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 211%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 361 363 361 364 362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 386
Write 365
Mixed 362
SusWrite 355
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 25.3
82% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 60.1
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 43.7
38% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 167 162 159 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 212
Mixed 164
SusWrite 160
251% 188 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.2
419% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 1.6
366% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 74 73 72 72 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 114
Write 39
Mixed 73
SusWrite 71.7
93% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback