Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 19:02
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 824
74% 622 Pts
64-Core 1,189
74% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 156
Parallax 171
201% 191 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 115
111% 138 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 157%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
664GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 402 395 367 379 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 463
Mixed 398
SusWrite 370
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 286
218% 298 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 102%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
510GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 405 398 370 381 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 439
Write 376
Mixed 355
SusWrite 372
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 33
103% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 171
167% 268 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 792 1174 1143 985 1030 1033 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,278
Write 1,345
Mixed 1,297
SusWrite 1,026
279% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 63.5
205% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 481
376% 532 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 203%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 329 320 319 318 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 356
Write 294
Mixed 324
SusWrite 319
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 17.1
56% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 62
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 59.2
45% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 159 165 160 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 211
Mixed 167
SusWrite 156
250% 187 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 2.4
440% 6.33 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.7
400% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 97%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 70 73 73 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 100
Write 37.7
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 72.3
90% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 31
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1369 111 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback