Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$184
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 712
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
663GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 392 401 402 377 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 464
Mixed 440
SusWrite 394
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 45.7
147% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 106%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
510GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 395 411 405 382 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 457
Mixed 406
SusWrite 398
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 47
146% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1178 1230 1217 1138 1117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,243
Write 1,306
Mixed 1,286
SusWrite 1,162
282% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 60.7
200% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 489
382% 540 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 208%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 361 365 363 359 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 388
Write 361
Mixed 348
SusWrite 359
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 25.8
83% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 61.5
46% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 165 159 151 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 214
Mixed 160
SusWrite 158
250% 187 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 2.3
442% 6.27 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.7
394% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 74 74 74 73 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 126
Write 33
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 72.7
92% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback