Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 215
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 860
78% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 414 405 410 401 415 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 480
Mixed 448
SusWrite 408
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 52.7
176% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
511GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 420 410 414 402 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 477
Mixed 424
SusWrite 412
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 57.7
189% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 1342 1396 1439 1396 831 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,410
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 1,216
300% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 78.9
258% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 648
481% 649 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 236%
Great: 394%
Asmt 2105 1TB
638GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 383
Write 377
Mixed 367
SusWrite 104
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 27.3
88% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 37.2
35% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 112 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 219
Write 222
Mixed 166
SusWrite 113
237% 180 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.2
419% 6.07 MB/s
DQ Read 2.6
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
370% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 107%
Apricorn EZ Upgrade 3.0 750GB
204GB free, PID 0320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 81 83 81 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 119
Write 36.4
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 81.1
95% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback