Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 18:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 162
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 321
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.27 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 210 214 229 231 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 210
Mixed 182
SusWrite 220
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25
85% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 174
137% 189 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
68GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 44 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 41.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 42.5
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 32%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
49GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 136 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 76.5
Write 78.6
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 135
56% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 26 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5958 22LS54
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback