HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 324
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$35
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 31 43 34 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 54.3
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 34.8
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 46%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
390GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 24.2
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 18.9
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 1TB
591GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 22.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 19
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback