NCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx  (all builds)
MotherboardNCR Pocono
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$71
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 108
44% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 171
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E198) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$65
951GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 81 90 75 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 86.8
Write 106
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 77.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F 02FE4C1315488918 EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xxxx-xxxx-xxxx Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: NCR xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $71
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback