Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 89
2-Core 177
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 293
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5.8
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 225 226 240 239 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.3% Good
Read 247
Write 223
Mixed 216
SusWrite 231
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 32.1
112% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 177
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
259GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 189 184 181 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 176
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 184
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
123GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 53 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 50.1
Write 55.5
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 54.1
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5958 22LS54
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback