Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 176
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 289
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.8
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 221 222 236 239 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.8% Very good
Read 241
Write 230
Mixed 230
SusWrite 230
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 39.9
128% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 189
144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
290GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 170 191 192 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 178
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 184
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
125GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 55 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 51.6
Write 57.9
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 54.8
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5958 22LS54
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback