Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus H61M-F (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 136 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 317 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 217 223 216 221 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.7% Good	Read 229 Write 208 Mixed 217 SusWrite 218 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 27.5 95% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 176 138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 288GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 171 179 181 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 182 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 178 105% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 103%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 123GB free Firmware: SW100-34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 57 57 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 51.6 Write 57.2 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 55.5 38% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	51	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	21x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	18x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	15x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	31x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	4x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 25%, 525 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16