Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus H61M-F (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '23 at 19:58
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 326 42% 320 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 225 234 236 237 235 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 237 Write 224 Mixed 224 SusWrite 231 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 32.2 102% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 288GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 188 188 186 184 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 185 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 187 106% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 103%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 123GB free Firmware: SW100-34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 57 58 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 50.9 Write 58.1 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 55.8 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	43	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	21x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	18x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	15x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	31x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	4x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 25%, 525 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16