Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 22:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 155
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 261
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.17 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.8
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 69 65 69 62 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.4% Very poor
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 121
SusWrite 72.9
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 5.1
15% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 128%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
40GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 48.7
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 46.8
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 32%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
315GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 130 145 151 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 110
Write 122
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 142
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5958 22LS54
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback