Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 204
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 215 206 228 229 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 180
Write 186
Mixed 175
SusWrite 215
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 23.9
89% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 153
119% 165 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
288GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 179 145 166 186 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 178
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 168
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
123GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 50 48 56 56 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 58.3
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 53.1
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 24 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5958 22LS54
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback