MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 300
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 887
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 145
Parallax 136
108% 138 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 805 513 487 467 457 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,826
Write 1,580
Mixed 615
SusWrite 530
253% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 70.2
256% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 1176
DQ Mixed 955
796% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 240%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 413
Mixed 402
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 56.8
209% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 228
207% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
84GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,233
Write 1,552
Mixed 1,295
305% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 66.2
230% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,397
DQ Write 1,477
DQ Mixed 1,307
1,019% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
32GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 353 320 305 282 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 444
Mixed 346
SusWrite 316
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48.8
185% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 347
265% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 84 94 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.4
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 94.5
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 153 153 156 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 121
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 157
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 79 105 97 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 94.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 111 103 104 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 104
Write 96.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 108
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 84 107 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 96.2
64% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 116 121 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66% Good
Read 111
Write 44.5
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 118
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
390GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 98 98 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 128
Write 134
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 98.2
123% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback