MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 10:04
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 302
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 861
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 149
Parallax 139
112% 142 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 144
Splatting 124
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 653 655 650 650 650 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,821
Write 1,579
Mixed 621
SusWrite 688
262% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 63.3
231% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1083
DQ Write 1193
DQ Mixed 972
778% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 236%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 275 276 276 211 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 443
Mixed 394
SusWrite 258
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 55.3
209% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 228
208% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
84GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,199
Write 1,917
Mixed 1,320
333% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 61.6
236% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 1,504
DQ Mixed 1,304
1,021% 1,401 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
101GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 453 453 455 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 453
Mixed 358
SusWrite 453
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 49.8
185% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 348
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 96 83 95 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 104
Write 92
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 94.4
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 162 152 154 151 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 154
Write 124
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 156
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 74 101 96 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 127
Write 116
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 93.2
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 109 104 104 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 102
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 107
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 105 98 83 96 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 94.3
62% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 120 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 110
Write 43.4
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 122
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 30.3
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 30.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 54.5
74% 54.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback