MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 12:06
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 876
89% 719 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 148
Parallax 138
109% 140 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 143
Splatting 123
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,751
Write 1555
Mixed 760
300% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 63.7
258% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 874
732% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 454
Mixed 417
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 58.2
208% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 227
207% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,216
Write 1,784
Mixed 1,325
324% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 71.4
245% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1379
DQ Write 1,508
DQ Mixed 1,300
1,018% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
107GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 450
Mixed 362
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48.5
185% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 350
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 71.2
59% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 195
Write 133
Mixed 105
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 88.7
Mixed 62
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 68.3
Mixed 74.7
61% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 99.7
Mixed 22.2
57% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 145
Mixed 71.7
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 30.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 31.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback