MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 883
90% 730 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 148
Parallax 137
111% 140 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 141
Splatting 122
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 670 668 610 603 601 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,708
Write 1,592
Mixed 640
SusWrite 675
257% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 64.6
237% 91.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 991
785% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 233%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 219 255 255 276 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 448
Mixed 412
SusWrite 263
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 59.3
210% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 230
209% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,285
Write 1,865
Mixed 1,319
335% 1,489 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 70.3
248% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,503
DQ Mixed 1,301
1,019% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
107GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 456 454 457 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 452
Mixed 358
SusWrite 456
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 50.6
189% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 351
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 85 96 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 62.6
Mixed 61
SusWrite 94.9
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 162 164 151 153 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 142
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 157
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 73 109 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 120
Write 93.8
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 99.1
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 109 117 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 108
Write 69.6
Mixed 62
SusWrite 111
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 94 94 102 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 96.8
64% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 113 79 113 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 119
Write 146
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 110
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 30.1
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback