Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 85
2-Core 176
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 290
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 360
Sapphire(174B 1325) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.40
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 25.2
14% 22.9 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 23.9
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$60
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 99 123 124 126 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 395
Write 356
Mixed 326
SusWrite 125
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 36.1
118% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 51.7
46% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback