MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 06:17
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 855
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 150
Parallax 141
113% 144 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 145
Splatting 125
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 664 665 616 610 611 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,613
Write 1573
Mixed 635
SusWrite 672
250% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 62.4
228% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 856
722% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 276 276 277 253 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 275
Mixed 333
SusWrite 271
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 59.3
214% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 234
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,394
Write 1,912
Mixed 1284
343% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 70.1
263% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 1,505
DQ Mixed 1305
1,021% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
107GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 454 455 454 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 453
Mixed 361
SusWrite 454
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 48.6
186% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 350
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 84 92 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 72.2
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 94.6
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 165 153 153 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 158
Mixed 104
SusWrite 158
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 76 107 92 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 121
Write 89.1
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 97.6
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 104 102 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 108
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 111 96 93 104 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 96.5
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 121 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 139
Write 39
Mixed 70
SusWrite 122
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 31.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback