MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 865
91% 726 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
109% 137 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 613 667 646 612 610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,698
Write 1,533
Mixed 772
SusWrite 614
257% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 65.5
250% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 846
722% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 233%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 305 277 277 275 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 300
Mixed 326
SusWrite 256
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 57.9
208% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 231
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1944 972 596 599 601 560 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 1,569
Mixed 1,337
SusWrite 879
284% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 71.6
239% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,500
DQ Mixed 1,301
1,018% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 242%
Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
124GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 448 458 449 455 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 466
Mixed 362
SusWrite 449
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 48.3
186% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 350
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 96 85 95 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 102
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 93.9
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 161 167 154 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 144
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 153
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 105 76 93 106 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 124
Write 110
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 91.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 111 113 106 105 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 102
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 107
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 113 99 96 104 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 117
Write 95.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 97.5
60% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 116 79 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 108
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 106
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
556GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 113 112 112 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 138
Write 142
Mixed 21
SusWrite 113
134% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 30.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback