MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 17:25
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 310
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 886
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 149
Parallax 140
113% 143 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 144
Splatting 125
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 645 643 643 638 636 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,728
Write 1,619
Mixed 748
SusWrite 679
266% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 71
254% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 859
736% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 242%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 275 277 274 223 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 254
Mixed 331
SusWrite 277
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.1
205% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 236
211% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
84GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,374
Write 1,926
Mixed 1,345
348% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 69.6
255% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1459
DQ Mixed 1,294
1,009% 1,380 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
101GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 453 453 454 455 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 452
Mixed 353
SusWrite 454
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 49
183% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 351
267% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 96 84 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.6
Mixed 76
SusWrite 94.3
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 152 154 154 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 126
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 156
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
32GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 106 85 102 92 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 93.9
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 104 102 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 108
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 110 93 92 99 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 93.1
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
23GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 121 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 112
Write 43.9
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 122
66% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2775 Q2775
Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback