Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 06:33
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 270
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,155
102% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 9.2
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 203
Parallax 197
182% 208 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 150
Splatting 133
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 602 603 601 595 572 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,502
Write 2,304
Mixed 1,638
SusWrite 645
396% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 80.8
271% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,667
DQ Write 1,448
DQ Mixed 1,518
1,149% 1,544 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 293%
Great: 340%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
184GB free
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 60 131 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 455
Write 361
Mixed 307
SusWrite 150
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 19.6
67% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 44.2
48% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
418GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 103 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 158
Write 142
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 102
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 145 167 176 175 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 123
Mixed 124
SusWrite 167
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
357% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.8% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback