Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 05:36
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,164
105% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,155
72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 10.9
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 199
Parallax 194
175% 203 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 146
Splatting 129
122% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 948 661 659 652 652 647 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,511
Write 2,337
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 703
402% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 82.5
271% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,517
DQ Write 1300
DQ Mixed 1,392
1,048% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 290%
Great: 340%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
184GB free
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 118 106 115 118 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 455
Write 270
Mixed 306
SusWrite 158
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 19.9
57% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 44.2
50% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
421GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 184
Write 151
Mixed 111
SusWrite 115
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 160 168 178 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 139
Write 158
Mixed 139
SusWrite 168
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
512% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 22.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback