Performance Results

Gaming 154%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 136%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 673
68% 553 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 256
Parallax 293
226% 276 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 241
Splatting 179
194% 247 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 193%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 984 1083 1082 1057 1066 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,130
Write 1,929
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 1,054
367% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 61.2
200% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 944
704% 941 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 254%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
15GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 413
Write 452
Mixed 359
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 35
126% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
292GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 89 89 85 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 84.9
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 114%
Desktop 101%
Workstation 105%

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback