Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 00:33
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 851
81% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 185
Parallax 177
135% 176 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 180
Splatting 123
117% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 516 515 646 551 582 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,621
Write 2,117
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 618
404% 1,812 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 92.8
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1275
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 1,090
818% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 288%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
302GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 397 489 667 386 466 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 2,392
Write 1,681
Mixed 1,459
SusWrite 502
335% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 17.9
125% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,156
784% 938 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 199%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
370GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 290 310 310 310 359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1TB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 104
66% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1.5TB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 37 33 41 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 73%
Flash USB Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 3.7 0 0.9 2.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.4
9% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4133 C19 Series F4-4000C16-8GTZNA 4133 C19 Series F4-4000C16-8GTZNA 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43.4
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 42.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback