Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,191
107% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 9.2
6% 9.5 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 207
Parallax 202
187% 213 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 153
Splatting 137
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 565 517 487 482 527 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 2298
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 584
388% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 81.7
269% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,530
DQ Write 1275
DQ Mixed 1,394
1,046% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 279%
Great: 340%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
184GB free
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 147 117 110 119 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 455
Write 338
Mixed 300
SusWrite 167
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 19.9
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 44.9
49% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
419GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 161 161 162 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 160
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 161 171 142 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 154
Mixed 125
SusWrite 161
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
496% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback